Evidence first
Where possible, factual claims are checked against primary sources such as provider documentation, broker or regulator records and independently viewable trading-account data. Provider statements are identified as claims when independent verification is not available.
Performance reporting
Historical performance is presented as historical evidence, not a forecast. We aim to show drawdown, sample length, trade count and fees alongside return figures when those data are available.
Balanced presentation
Potential benefits should not be presented without relevant risks. We avoid language implying that returns are guaranteed, safe or predictable when the evidence does not support that conclusion.
Corrections and updates
Trading products, fees, broker arrangements and published performance can change. Material pages should be reviewed when significant new information becomes available. If a factual error is identified, we aim to correct it rather than silently preserve outdated information.
Commercial relationships
If AI Trading Review receives compensation through an affiliate or commercial relationship, that relationship should be disclosed clearly. Commercial relationships do not change the criteria used in our review framework.
What we do not provide
Content is general information and research, not personalised investment, legal or tax advice. Readers are responsible for deciding whether a product is appropriate for their circumstances and jurisdiction.